Make logo

Make

A visual automation builder where workflows are drawn as flowcharts with branching and error handling.

$9/mo billed annually for Core (10,000 credits)Free tier

What it actually does

Make builds automations on a visual canvas: each app is a module, and you wire them together with routers, filters, and error paths. It handles branching logic that simpler tools reserve for higher tiers.

The appeal for cost-sensitive founders is price. The Core plan gives 10,000 credits for $9/mo, roughly half of Zapier's entry cost for far more headroom, and the free tier allows multi-step scenarios that Zapier's free plan blocks.

Make bills in credits (most actions cost one credit), and credits expire monthly with no rollover. When credits run out, scenarios stop dead rather than billing you, which protects cost but means webhooks fired during that window are lost unless you enable top-ups or watch usage alerts. Expect an evening to learn the editor.

Make vs its main rivals

The tools people actually weigh against Make: Zapier, n8n, Pabbly Connect. Same criteria for every column, including where Make loses.

Make logoMakeZapier logoZapiern8n logon8nPPabbly Connect
Pricing & access
Free tierYes1,000 credits/moYes100 tasks/moYesSelf-host onlyNoTrial
Starting price$9/mo$19.99/mo$0 self-host / ~$24/mo cloud$249 lifetime
Scaling & limits
Multi-step on free tierYesYesNo2-step onlyYesYesNon/a
Billing unitPer credit/opPer task (per step)Per executionPer task
App integrations~2,0007,000+~1,000+~2,000
Workflow
Visual flowchart builderYesYesNoLinearYesNode canvasNoLinear
Branching / routers / error pathsYesYesYesPaths (paid)YesYesYesRouters
Ease of setupYesModerateYesEasiestNoTechnicalYesSimple
Developer & API
Custom code stepsYesYesYesPaidYesNativeNoLimited
WebhooksFreePaidFreePaid
Self-host optionNoNoNoNoYesYesNoNo
Worth it for
  • Best price per operation of the hosted options: 10,000 credits for $9 versus Zapier's 100 free tasks
  • Visual builder handles branching, routers, and error paths that Zapier reserves for higher tiers
  • Free tier allows multi-step scenarios, unlike Zapier
Watch out for
  • When credits run out, scenarios stop dead until you top up, and webhooks missed during that window are gone
  • Steeper learning curve; expect an evening to get comfortable with the editor
  • Integration catalog (~2,000) is smaller than Zapier's 7,000+, and there is no self-host option

Pay less for it

5 ways found
Annual billing

Saves 15% or more versus monthly on Core and higher plans

Free plan

1,000 credits/mo and multi-step scenarios cover light automation at $0

Consolidate steps

Fewer modules per scenario means fewer credits consumed per run

Self-host n8n instead

For heavy multi-step workflows, self-hosted n8n bills per execution, not per operation, and is free to run

Cheaper swap

n8nIf you are technical, self-hosted n8n removes per-operation billing entirely and runs unlimited workflows on a cheap VPS

See this for your whole stack, with your real numbers

StackTracker tracks what you actually pay for Make and every other tool, flags overpayment, and shows the dollars you would save by switching.

See plans

Is it the right tool for you

Pick it if
  • You are cost-sensitive and will spend an evening learning the editor
  • Your workflows need branching, routers, or error handling
  • You want multi-step automation on a free tier
Skip it if
  • You need an obscure integration Make does not cover → use Zapier
  • You are technical and want unlimited executions with no credit ceiling → use n8n

Track what Make and the rest of your stack cost

StackTracker adds up every subscription, plus your hours, so you see the real number.

Prices and limits last verified 2026-07-20.